Join date: Apr 25, 2022


Peculiarities of Reviewing Manuscripts, Scientific Articles, Dissertations and Monographs

Each scientific material is evaluated by an expert who has a degree or understands the topic. This process is called peer review. Its main purpose is manifested in:

  • checking the text according to criteria such as reliability and accuracy;

  • improvement of data in terms of presentation and design;

  • compliance with the standards in force in a particular area;

  • establishing a relationship of trust with the audience.

"Review" in Latin means "assessment, criticism, review." It is often referred to as a special genre, which is based on feedback (criticism). This document reflects attitudes and recommendations for the study.

Before creating, it is necessary to fully familiarize yourself with the material, take into account all the principles, postulates and rules that the author relied on. The reviewer must see what the average reader might not notice. It is very difficult to get a "zest" in the absence of knowledge and experience, so he must be well versed in a particular area.

Each review is based on a comprehensive and objective analysis, during which the "center" of further judgments will be identified. It reflects a certain thought, idea, provides an evidence base, highlights the opinion of the reviewer. The fundamental element is the thesis disclosed in the publication. It is on it that they rely in the course of the analysis and evaluation of the work.

The standard review structure includes:

  • the subject of analysis, that is, what is subjected to verification by qualified specialists: term paper, diploma work, dissertation, etc.

  • relevance of the topic: highlights the importance of the aspects under consideration, their expediency, significance;

  • a brief description of the study: the reviewer's understanding of the content of the work, the main idea, its analysis;

  • assessment: the attitude to the work of the author is stated, a general description is given, advantages and disadvantages, novelty, depth of disclosure of the topic are noted, arguments are given;

  • findings.

Written evaluation of monographs

The monograph is subject to mandatory evaluation by qualified experts. It will be allowed for publication only if there are at least 2 reviews. The reviewer evaluates the quality of the material, conducts a thesis analysis, compares the title and content, checks the design requirements, determines novelty and completeness, identifies advantages and disadvantages, and determines the practical significance of the study.

The review of the monograph includes the following sections: the title of the article and information about the author, a brief description, relevance, advantages and disadvantages, evaluation of the results of the work, information about the reviewer.

More resources: What Is the Difference Between PhD and Doctoral Dissertations? Structure and Content of a Doctoral Dissertation Features of Preparing a Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Science Who Appoints Dissertation Defense Opponents? The Right Choice of Official Dissertation Opponents

Karl Rockwell

More actions